Unlawful Government Policy: Mandatory Childhood Vaccination

It is destroying human health

This document has been put together by Dr. Judy Wilyman PhD (Public Health) and Dr. Phillip Altman PhD (Pharmacology) and we hope that all members of the public will take this evidence to their politicians to obtain the removal of No Jab No Pay/Play policies immediately. Mandatory vaccination policies are not based on medical evidence and they are indisputably a serious risk to human health.

Here is a 10 min video clip of the reasons I started to question vaccines in the early 1990’s.

Coercive vaccination in Australian Social Services policies (No Jab No Pay/Play) is unlawful. This is because it is not justified in Health Law. It is unjustified for four main reasons:

1. Vaccination is not mandated in Health Law because it was only a secondary measure in the control of infectious diseases globally. It was adopted in Australia, and all other countries, after 1950, when public health reforms, nutrition and antibiotics, had already removed the serious risk of both death and illness, due to all infectious diseases. Only communities with poor public health reforms were at serious risk after 1950. Cases of these diseases still existed but in the majority of cases they were mild or asymptomatic (sub-clinical) with no symptoms) resulting in natural immunity for the individual and herd immunity for the community.

Government Evidence Here

2. Coercion in health promotion is against health promotion ethics. This is because it causes mental and physical illness due to stress. Doctor’s medical ethical guidelines are being violated by the medical regulator, AHPRA, because this board is preventing doctors’ from giving patients ‘informed consent, without coercion, manipulation or pressure” (AIH Ed 10).

Doctors are being deregistered by AHPRA for providing ‘antivaccination material’ and this includes discussing the very real risks of vaccination. Genetics means many people are predisposed to illnesses after vaccination and this is destroying many lives.

Is AHPRA a government or a corporate board making profit for its shareholders? The answer is both -AHPRA is a government-corporate board. So, is this lawful and have you been informed?

3. The government has never used a true inert placebo to critically and reliably assess vaccine safety in clinical trials for vaccines prior to marketing to the public. Doctors do not know this. This represents medical fraud.

Government Evidence Here

4. All drugs (vaccines are drugs) have adverse effects (AE’s) in some individuals due to genetic diversity. In the case of vaccination, the government-corporate regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administrator, (96% funded by industry), has never set up an adverse event reporting system in 70+ years that can reliably detect, assess, and report adverse events likely caused by the vaccines.

This simply requires follow up of the health outcomes of every vaccinated child for 5-10 years. If this data were made available, health professionals could determine the risk benefit of using multiple vaccines in developing infants, without it doctors are assuming safety and ignoring the significant increase in chronic illnesses.

It is not in the interest of the corporate sponsors to report the types and incidence of vaccine adverse events. Pharmaceutical companies have been indemnified from any liability for harm caused by any drug categorised as a ‘vaccine’. They would lose sales if the true safety risks become widely known. There is simply no incentive to advise prescribers or the public of the true risks of any vaccine or the combination of vaccines.

In other words, the actual number of deaths or type and frequency of AE’s that are occurring in healthy children after vaccination have never been determined. The evidence in the population shows a 10-fold increase in chronic illnesses in children, since 1990, and this is a direct dose-response correlation to the vaccination program; the strongest evidence scientists have for a causal link. Yet the Australian government has never investigated this correlation.

This means that the claims of safety of the combined schedule of 15+ vaccines (~45+ doses) is being made on undone science: important science that has never been done. The government is claiming they are safe and ‘adverse events are rare’ without any data or hard evidence. It is an unmonitored experiment.

Hence, mandating multiple drugs called ‘vaccines’ in the healthy population is a crime against humanity.

No parent should be coerced and/or financially penalised to vaccinate their child because no credible evidence exists to show that the benefits of childhood vaccination outweigh the risk of developing widely reported chronic illnesses or death. Post-vaccination chronic disease includes neurodevelopmental disorders, autism, autoimmune disease, allergic conditions, asthma, anaphylaxis, learning disability, speech disorder etc. and death.

Not a single childhood vaccine has been properly safety tested in randomised, true placebo controlled, long term clinical trials despite the recognition that childhood neurological problems have skyrocketed in incidence contemporaneously with increasing use of these injections.

Government Evidence Here

Childhood vaccines contain known neurotoxins such as mercury and aluminium. No credible risk/benefit analysis has been performed to justify coerced or mandated use of any vaccine.

To date there have been many studies of various design and subject number comparing the overall health of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children, however, all studies consistently support the view that vaccinated children are generally sicker across all health outcomes than unvaccinated children.

Documentary - An Inconvenient Study. The largest study completed over 10 years showing significantly increased risk of chronic illnesses in vaccinated children

“An Inconvenient Study” Explained

This is the largest and best designed of the 13 clinical studies comparing the health of vaxxed vs unvaxxed children. The Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit), studied 18,468 children over ten years and found that “exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination” (Lamerato L. et al: Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study).

This is why Australia’s Social Services Policies that mandate vaccines are unlawful. They are founded on medical fraud and not supported by Health laws. They must be repealed immediately as they are destroying the genetic fabric of society.

Parents must take action by showing this evidence to their politicians/doctors and by not complying with laws that are a serious risk to public health. Please also sign up and support the doctors at the Australian Medical Professional Society (AMPS) that are standing up for the patients best interest but are being persecuted by the corporate-medical regulator, AHPRA, for abiding by their medical ethical guidelines.