I wrote via email to TGA early when Covid vaccines were being introduced. Questioning why they had taken overseas lab tests as proven good for distribution even though their job it is to test everything
before any prescriptions for use are given. I wondered if a power behind their decision not to do the usual tests was connected to overseas powers? Looks like my suspicions of devious overseas plans
to take Australia and make our institutions look dumb worked.
Independent MP Russell Broadbent's call to halt the GM COVID vaccines until further investigation into synthetic DNA contamination is a wake-up call for us all. With contamination levels 145 times over the TGA’s safety limit and linked to cancers, it’s time to ask: why aren’t we pausing to reassess? How many more heart problems and hospitalisations—particularly in the under 40s—need to occur before the government stops dismissing these concerns?
Those who critically assess vaccines aren’t “anti-vaxxers”—they are informed individuals demanding accountability, transparency, and real science. When a public health intervention leads to alarming evidence of harm, we must ask: who is doing the risk assessment? Are pharmaceutical companies, which stand to profit, the best guardians of our health?
It’s absurd that governments are not protecting citizens by questioning this contamination, forcing local councils like Port Hedland to step into a role that rightfully belongs to our federal and state leaders. Why are they silent? Is willful blindness really the strategy they are banking on to escape accountability? The public deserves better, and a reckoning is coming.
In this era, blind faith in government narratives has become a dangerous substitute for science. Questioning policies isn’t conspiracy—it’s democracy in action.
Hi Gaz, I’m sure you realised but that was exactly my point. The term is being misused by the government to dismiss critical thinking about this medication. We are not “antivaxxers” and dismissing educated people with this bullying term is a crime because it has life and death consequences for the people who are harmed by these drugs that we are not allowed to criticise. In a world with morals and integrity the politicians, doctors and journalists using this term would be charged with a criminal offence.
I share your hope that more people are beginning to wake up to the reckless actions and overreach we’re witnessing. The reality that even politicians, who should have a vested interest in their children’s futures, seem to turn a blind eye to the long-term consequences of their decisions is deeply troubling. It’s as though they are swept up in a tide of short-term gains, political expediency, or external pressures, without pausing to reflect on the legacy they are leaving behind.
Why are they making decisions that will inevitably harm future generations, including their own children—is one that speaks to a broader disconnect? Perhaps it’s a combination of arrogance, denial, or belief that they can shield themselves and their families from the fallout. Yet, history shows that no one is immune to the consequences of bad governance, especially when it comes to fundamental rights and freedoms. This is a source of great concern, not only for the harm it causes but for the moral blindness it reveals in those we’ve entrusted with authority. It’s a wake-up call for all of us to continue resisting policies that strip away autonomy and threaten the well-being of future generations.
Thanks Gaz and I believe we can be hopeful that people are starting to see the stupidity and criminality in the government’s actions. Even politicians will want a future for their children!
Thank you Judy for continually bringing to the forefront an unbiased and factual truth around this whole vaccination process and how each person needs to learn the value of being able to question anything
I believe terms like antivaxxer, follow the science , anti science, conspiracy theorist were terms ushered in by pharma. The weaponized terms were used against those who spoke out about the shots. That includes doctors who spoke out and had their reputations smeared or lost their jobs. All health agencies worldwide take funding from pharma so do hospitals, medical journals and politicians. As a vaccine injured person my life has irrevocably changed, because of that I’ve done tons of research. I had no idea about the awesome power of pharma. This is a huge problem and detrimental to our health.
"Thou shalt not question the Orthodox Science, nor its Orthodox interpretations. Thou shalt trust our Science, and trust our Orthodox Experts." The assertion that a government tells the truth and/or is morally right, is of itself misinformation.
I wrote via email to TGA early when Covid vaccines were being introduced. Questioning why they had taken overseas lab tests as proven good for distribution even though their job it is to test everything
before any prescriptions for use are given. I wondered if a power behind their decision not to do the usual tests was connected to overseas powers? Looks like my suspicions of devious overseas plans
to take Australia and make our institutions look dumb worked.
If you have this little network of agreements in place, why do tests?
https://www.dst.defence.gov.au/partnership/medical-countermeasures-consortium
It's not medical any more, it's a defence project
https://www.dst.defence.gov.au/news/2013/07/01/defence-and-health-sign-agreement-medical-countermeasures
Independent MP Russell Broadbent's call to halt the GM COVID vaccines until further investigation into synthetic DNA contamination is a wake-up call for us all. With contamination levels 145 times over the TGA’s safety limit and linked to cancers, it’s time to ask: why aren’t we pausing to reassess? How many more heart problems and hospitalisations—particularly in the under 40s—need to occur before the government stops dismissing these concerns?
Those who critically assess vaccines aren’t “anti-vaxxers”—they are informed individuals demanding accountability, transparency, and real science. When a public health intervention leads to alarming evidence of harm, we must ask: who is doing the risk assessment? Are pharmaceutical companies, which stand to profit, the best guardians of our health?
It’s absurd that governments are not protecting citizens by questioning this contamination, forcing local councils like Port Hedland to step into a role that rightfully belongs to our federal and state leaders. Why are they silent? Is willful blindness really the strategy they are banking on to escape accountability? The public deserves better, and a reckoning is coming.
In this era, blind faith in government narratives has become a dangerous substitute for science. Questioning policies isn’t conspiracy—it’s democracy in action.
Hi Gaz, I’m sure you realised but that was exactly my point. The term is being misused by the government to dismiss critical thinking about this medication. We are not “antivaxxers” and dismissing educated people with this bullying term is a crime because it has life and death consequences for the people who are harmed by these drugs that we are not allowed to criticise. In a world with morals and integrity the politicians, doctors and journalists using this term would be charged with a criminal offence.
Of course Judy, I wanted to underline the point you were making. Looking forward to your next article.
I share your hope that more people are beginning to wake up to the reckless actions and overreach we’re witnessing. The reality that even politicians, who should have a vested interest in their children’s futures, seem to turn a blind eye to the long-term consequences of their decisions is deeply troubling. It’s as though they are swept up in a tide of short-term gains, political expediency, or external pressures, without pausing to reflect on the legacy they are leaving behind.
Why are they making decisions that will inevitably harm future generations, including their own children—is one that speaks to a broader disconnect? Perhaps it’s a combination of arrogance, denial, or belief that they can shield themselves and their families from the fallout. Yet, history shows that no one is immune to the consequences of bad governance, especially when it comes to fundamental rights and freedoms. This is a source of great concern, not only for the harm it causes but for the moral blindness it reveals in those we’ve entrusted with authority. It’s a wake-up call for all of us to continue resisting policies that strip away autonomy and threaten the well-being of future generations.
Thanks Gaz and I believe we can be hopeful that people are starting to see the stupidity and criminality in the government’s actions. Even politicians will want a future for their children!
Thank you Judy for continually bringing to the forefront an unbiased and factual truth around this whole vaccination process and how each person needs to learn the value of being able to question anything
Susanne
Thank you Dr Judy for your tireless work in bringing the truth to us. If only my kids would listen.
I hate vaccines and drugs. I just would never consider using those poisons.
I believe terms like antivaxxer, follow the science , anti science, conspiracy theorist were terms ushered in by pharma. The weaponized terms were used against those who spoke out about the shots. That includes doctors who spoke out and had their reputations smeared or lost their jobs. All health agencies worldwide take funding from pharma so do hospitals, medical journals and politicians. As a vaccine injured person my life has irrevocably changed, because of that I’ve done tons of research. I had no idea about the awesome power of pharma. This is a huge problem and detrimental to our health.
"Thou shalt not question the Orthodox Science, nor its Orthodox interpretations. Thou shalt trust our Science, and trust our Orthodox Experts." The assertion that a government tells the truth and/or is morally right, is of itself misinformation.