14 Comments
User's avatar
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

As you say Judy: “Scott Morrison’s government forced this untested jab on the entire Australian population by facilitating premiers to remove people from their jobs and ostracising them from society and from their families. This was a violation of the ethical guidelines that doctors are required to practice when treating their patients.”

The then-members of National Cabinet are in this up to their necks, they actively conspired to restrict the freedoms of the unvaccinated.

In this regard, see my recent FOI request for a BETA Report recommending 'restricting the freedoms' of unvaccinated people: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/foi-request-for-a-beta-report-recommending-restricting-the-freedoms-of-unvaccinated-people.pdf

Also published in my substack article: ‘Restrict the freedoms of the unvaccinated’ Where is the BETA report that called for this treachery? https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/restrict-the-freedoms-of-the-unvaccinated

Expand full comment
Les Kraft's avatar

Interesting parallels ...Scomo & the very topical ‘ deathcap mushroom murderer ‘ --

Note tho ‘ the differing coverage of these by the press :). Yes. I’m drawing on 5 years of a main stream media that has NEVER Ever , ( not once ), considered that a Covid vaccine has killed one Australian ! Not one !

Yet ,, We had yesterday , the almost hysterical , continuous coverage of the ‘ death cap mushroom murderer ‘

Non stop - it ran all bloody afternoon & night , Then again today. .... on. You guessed it - the lame stream media.

Whilst that degree of bias exists - the real story of mass murder from Covid vaccines will remain hush hush.

And besides , the Truth on the Covid vx poison would have to include the entire political system, both parties , state & fed, the ‘ medical authorities so corrupted & coerced // AHPRA & the TGA to coerce and blackmail the doctors into obeying to such treacherous’ absence of reality practices of choice & informed consent -

Perhaps. ...there is a hope that as the RFK juggernaut exposes the treachery from the WHO & CDC downward , that the real truth will one day be told !

I hope , for the sake of those ‘ forests of the fallen - and the 100,000 deaths in Australia from COvid vaccines , that this happens sooner -- MUCH sooner ... to correct a massive wrong , a stench so rotten to the core of a once

honest country like ours.

Les Kraft , is Les Catterwell, is Les Katt

Expand full comment
Emmett's avatar

Yep we live in upside down Clowntown where morons like ScoMo, Dan Andrews, Mark Magooan et al all got commended and rewarded for their roles during the Scamdemic and we the people allowed it ???

Expand full comment
Kerrin Donaldson's avatar

Absolutely. Thank you for writing with a clear voice. I couldn't believe Scott Morrison was honoured with an award when he should have been charged with crimes against humanity. I am now highly suspicious of the power source driver behind those 'awards.'

Expand full comment
karen elliot's avatar

You may recall: The AstraZeneca jab, affectionately known as "The Clot Shot", was

suspended from use by a number of countries, until the cause of the clotting was

understood...

According to a report in 'The Saturday Paper' around the time federal health officials

met with PM Morrison to discus the suspension of the AZ Clot Shot for the same

reason. Until then the AZ Jab was being used only on 65+ year old persons... PM

Morrison ignored their requests and ok'd the use of the AZ Clot Shot for everyone...

Having bought the pig-in-a-poke AZ Clot Shot, It may have cost the Morrison

government dearly in votes to just destroy the Clot Shot Jabs...

The Question is: Why was Morrison even having any involvement in such a matter ?

Isnt the national regulatory body supposed to be independent, not subject to

political interference ?

Within a very short while after Morrison's decision to extend the use of The Clot

Shot to all age groups, Premier Gladys imposed a lock-down on NSW, informing

there'd be no return to 'normal' 'til everyone submitted...

Expand full comment
Moni's avatar

Well written and researched Judy. I might add the incidence and increase of SIDS. What stats do we have available since 1960-2025 on the correlation of SIDS & Vaccines?

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

Great post! Thank you for documenting and summarizing this democide.

Expand full comment
J.P.'s avatar

There are two significant facts which argue against a portion of your analysis here.

The marked increase in all-cause mortality post 2021 is mostly confined to the 65-74 and 75+ age brackets (2015-2024 ABS mortality data stratified by age, Graph 3 here: https://fullbroadside.substack.com/p/sustained-overkill ). 0-44s is either unchanged from long term averages or deliberately tampered with. This is a huge clue.

Second, the administration of end-of-life palliative care sedatives skyrockets to stratospheric levels, *and stays there,* post 2021: https://www.shiftedparadigms.org/p/sedation-not-salvation-part-3

Put together, we have our primary cause of ongoing excess mortality.

The vaxxes are terrible, yes, but they too are a mere cover for the ongoing geriatric iatrocide in care homes at the hands of palliative "care" end of life drugs.

Expand full comment
Judy Wilyman PhD's avatar

Thank you for your response. I believe there are a number of ways in which the data is being manipulated to hide causal links to excess deaths and illnesses. There has definitely been a significant increase in deaths in younger demographics since 2021 due to strokes, heart attacks, SAD, embolisms and cancers etc due to the COVID injections. These are well documented and the Forest of the Fallen displays are testimony to this.

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

Actually, the vaccines were never about curing people, they were about making investors in WHO richer than they already are and the more people they got vaccinated, the more money they got paid by doing so - so if you were injured or are now dead, well, you did not matter, you served your purpose which was to be exterminated as Human Rubbish while making those who invested in WHO considerably richer and you still can, for the same reasons now, the next time you have another vaccine:

The WHO offers donors a 3,400% return on investment, openly promoting “at least $35 for every $1 invested.”

WHO’s Directing Global Health Policy?”

Published by the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS), June 2025

Purpose of the Report

This independent investigation by AMPS critically examines the World Health Organization’s (WHO) funding mechanisms, focusing on the top-100 non-country donors to the WHO’s voluntary contributions for specified purposes in 2022–2023. The report aims to evaluate whether these funding arrangements compromise the WHO’s independence, especially given its central role in new global health treaties such as:

The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

The WHO Pandemic Treaty/Agreement.

Key Findings

Donor Influence and Return on Investment

The WHO offers donors a 3,400% return on investment, openly promoting “at least $35 for every $1 invested.”

Ian Brighthope

Dr. Vernon Coleman: How Drug Companies Bribed Doctors to Vaccinate, Vaccinate and Vaccinate

How sad it is that doctors have sold themselves, and now conspire against the people they have sworn to protect.

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jun 25, 2025

Me: For investors to get their $35 profit on each $1 spent, they have to force us Human Rubbish to take Big Pharma's products and vaccines and to be exterminated, sooner or later, by a multitude of methods, including Cancers.

Should you wish to make these rich people and companies even richer, by donating your life, then go ahead, make their day and become a GMO with zero Human Rights, or dead, or for anything else Big Pharma comes up with, like "wearables" with the same ultimate intention, to GMO and exterminate us for their money and profit.

So if each investor invests $100 for your free vaccine shot, they are paid "at least" $3,500 back, after your free vaccine injection, multiplied by the numbers of free vaccine shots, they invested in, from the outset. Money for Jam - but if nobody gets a vaccine, then the investors don't make any money, or get anything paid back, do they - so how to get the maximum number of vaccinations made, to make their original investments, pay out handsomely?

Expand full comment
Mart's avatar

Greg Hunt 'a told a so' can't be denied and 'we' mostly just went on ahead and 'partook' of said 'experiment', I do declare 'our' level of 'trusting government' has 'died just as suddenly' as the population has..!

Thanks once again Judy, you're a trooper for sure..!

HalleluYah, Amen..! <3

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Thanks for this Judy. Can you provide links to cancer stats? Also, I’m trying to find a complete data set on strokes but can’t. Best wishes, Kim

Expand full comment
Heather's avatar

Genuine critical analysis please... how about engaging with the best defence of the vaccine (someone like Vinay Prasad) and critically engaging with their arguments... Simply asserting a position isn't critical analysis. Finding a straw man to defeat isn't either. I'd be fascinated to read a genuine critical discussion between you and someone who acknowledges a benefit of the Vax in the elderly, someone who is critically reflective on vaccines but has concluded the COVID Vax risk benefit ratio is beneficial to some cohorts.

Expand full comment
Judy Wilyman PhD's avatar

Interesting comment Heather when it appears you are not even aware that this injection is not even a ‘vaccine’. Before jumping in with accusations and false claims about an article perhaps you should do some research. My comments are based on my critical analysis of the manufacture of vaccines from my PhD research. What are your comments based on Heather? It appears they are just to smear and be critical but perhaps you can surprise me?

Expand full comment