They only get away with this crap because the people don’t protest. Mass opposition from us would change the rules real fast. We have let them get away with too much for too long!
You live in Candyland if you believe that WRITING TO YOUR POLITICIANS will do S.F.A. (for non-Aussies, SFA is a technical Legal term, Sweet Fuck All🤷) Each of the Major & Minion Parties have been BOUGHT & PAID FOR by BigSick. It is a done deal. Whether in power Labor or out of power Liberal (the UniParty), Whether Soros owned Greens or Oligarch owned Teals or Nationals, THESE ARE THE ENEMIES of the Australian People.
We need a Strong Man. Not this Fascist Socialism! BTW, about Socialism, hmmm? The "Z" in NAZI? It's German for Zocialism! Get it??? Z=S? Du'oh! Australians must control and benefit from Australia. Not Foreign Powers, NOT FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. 🖕
NATIONALISE AUSTRALIA. Because AUSTRALIA belongs to the Australian BORN, not the USA, not China, not ISRAEL, not Ukraine, not the UN NOR the WEF! And it DOES NOT BELONG to BIGPHARMA.
What’s more interesting is that ‘correlation does not prove causation’ applies solely to their injections when people die or are injured but their other claim that the presence of a fragment of the alleged SARS-CoV2 virus detected via PCR definitely causes COVID-19 the disease. Why is this not the same - ‘correlation does not prove causation’?
There also needs to be closer scrutiny on the claim that vaccines go through 7-10 years of safety trials. I think this is another carefully crafted claim to give vaccines the appearance of legitimacy. ICAN produced this document: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/no-placebo-101823.pdf which shows the pre-licensure trial lengths, pathetic as they are. The 7-10 year claim appears to include post-marketing surveillance, which the authorities use as a way of reassuring the public that "robust" safety systems are in place, when the reality is (as most of us know), the systems don't capture all events & have severe limitations (probably by design, a poor safety surveillance system benefits the pharmaceutical corporations by hiding harms & providing plausible deniability).
The mandates are unacceptable no matter how long testing is done and no matter what the claimed "safety and efficacy" is. This is an incredibly important point.
There are no drugs that enhance the prospect of living a healthier life or a longer life being in good health. We don't really understand diseases and sickness and how to avoid them. Modern medicine needs a constant flurry of diseased patients to survive and thrive (financially) and the mantra is always we need to give you vaccines for life or drugs for life....and never ending tests as you age.
I know several newborns over the last few years and to think they are going to be "needled" into oblivion for NO good and decent reason is abhorring and utterly disgusting. Yet, the parents are still blind to the potential outcomes and blindly trust their doctors, who for the most part are clueless about the drugs they pass out like candy.
Thank you Judy for continuing to raise this issue, it is so wrong and our government needs to be challenged, I worry about my young grandchildren and what they will be faced with.
"When bodily autonomy is violated by mandatory government policies, then human health can only be protected if these medications, are proven save and effective before they are mandated in the population." So are you therefore pro-vaccine mandates Judy, if the vaccines are safe and effective?
That was an excellent dissection of how things have flipped. What a mess, Judy. These people have no conscience and the population has no critical thinking skills, nor any mechanism to truly shut down such things at will.
Interesting your use of the phrase Precautionary Principle. Over the decades we have watched the medical and pharma industry convince people to the point where being precautionary is the go-to mentality. They have been priming us for years.
`Go to the doctor, just in case', `give your child these vaxes, just in case' etc - alongside the push to becoming obsessed with your health through the media. May be why so many willingly bought into the con, while the remainder were coerced?
i wasnt i saw through the mass formation psychosis psy-op from day one and told people so ,unfortunately they prefered to watch the liars in power every night and the lying media tell them i was wrong and they were right ,most now know they should have paid more attention to me rather than the bbc and boris the very rich ex-pm
They only get away with this crap because the people don’t protest. Mass opposition from us would change the rules real fast. We have let them get away with too much for too long!
Vet wise to the government deception in the podcast:
https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/uz7sS0389Kb
You live in Candyland if you believe that WRITING TO YOUR POLITICIANS will do S.F.A. (for non-Aussies, SFA is a technical Legal term, Sweet Fuck All🤷) Each of the Major & Minion Parties have been BOUGHT & PAID FOR by BigSick. It is a done deal. Whether in power Labor or out of power Liberal (the UniParty), Whether Soros owned Greens or Oligarch owned Teals or Nationals, THESE ARE THE ENEMIES of the Australian People.
We need a Strong Man. Not this Fascist Socialism! BTW, about Socialism, hmmm? The "Z" in NAZI? It's German for Zocialism! Get it??? Z=S? Du'oh! Australians must control and benefit from Australia. Not Foreign Powers, NOT FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. 🖕
NATIONALISE AUSTRALIA. Because AUSTRALIA belongs to the Australian BORN, not the USA, not China, not ISRAEL, not Ukraine, not the UN NOR the WEF! And it DOES NOT BELONG to BIGPHARMA.
Turn our flag upside down. It IS Time. To WTFU 👏
What’s more interesting is that ‘correlation does not prove causation’ applies solely to their injections when people die or are injured but their other claim that the presence of a fragment of the alleged SARS-CoV2 virus detected via PCR definitely causes COVID-19 the disease. Why is this not the same - ‘correlation does not prove causation’?
There also needs to be closer scrutiny on the claim that vaccines go through 7-10 years of safety trials. I think this is another carefully crafted claim to give vaccines the appearance of legitimacy. ICAN produced this document: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/no-placebo-101823.pdf which shows the pre-licensure trial lengths, pathetic as they are. The 7-10 year claim appears to include post-marketing surveillance, which the authorities use as a way of reassuring the public that "robust" safety systems are in place, when the reality is (as most of us know), the systems don't capture all events & have severe limitations (probably by design, a poor safety surveillance system benefits the pharmaceutical corporations by hiding harms & providing plausible deniability).
The mandates are unacceptable no matter how long testing is done and no matter what the claimed "safety and efficacy" is. This is an incredibly important point.
There are no drugs that enhance the prospect of living a healthier life or a longer life being in good health. We don't really understand diseases and sickness and how to avoid them. Modern medicine needs a constant flurry of diseased patients to survive and thrive (financially) and the mantra is always we need to give you vaccines for life or drugs for life....and never ending tests as you age.
I know several newborns over the last few years and to think they are going to be "needled" into oblivion for NO good and decent reason is abhorring and utterly disgusting. Yet, the parents are still blind to the potential outcomes and blindly trust their doctors, who for the most part are clueless about the drugs they pass out like candy.
Thank you Judy for continuing to raise this issue, it is so wrong and our government needs to be challenged, I worry about my young grandchildren and what they will be faced with.
Vaccines are Population Control
As are statins, processed foods, seed oils etc...
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
The demonisation of red meat, eggs and cholesterol plus the promotion of veganism fit into your hypothesis Fast Eddy.
Good point - if they say to avoid something e.g. the sun... red meat... do the opposite ... in moderation.
Exactly 👍🏻
"When bodily autonomy is violated by mandatory government policies, then human health can only be protected if these medications, are proven save and effective before they are mandated in the population." So are you therefore pro-vaccine mandates Judy, if the vaccines are safe and effective?
There can be no vaccine mandates as coercion and mandates preclude voluntary informed consent.
Of course there have been coercion and mandates...so this means there is no valid consent.
It's a disastrous situation for the medical 'profession'.
They should never have collaborated with coercion and mandates, they've violated voluntary informed consent.
For more background, see my detailed article: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
That was an excellent dissection of how things have flipped. What a mess, Judy. These people have no conscience and the population has no critical thinking skills, nor any mechanism to truly shut down such things at will.
Interesting your use of the phrase Precautionary Principle. Over the decades we have watched the medical and pharma industry convince people to the point where being precautionary is the go-to mentality. They have been priming us for years.
`Go to the doctor, just in case', `give your child these vaxes, just in case' etc - alongside the push to becoming obsessed with your health through the media. May be why so many willingly bought into the con, while the remainder were coerced?
i wasnt i saw through the mass formation psychosis psy-op from day one and told people so ,unfortunately they prefered to watch the liars in power every night and the lying media tell them i was wrong and they were right ,most now know they should have paid more attention to me rather than the bbc and boris the very rich ex-pm